Nutrition Journal Special Report on 2010 Dietary Guidelines for Americans

The below news article is from the scientific, peer-reviewed journal, Nutrition and links to a special report criticizing the new 2010 Dietary Guidelines for Americans (you can see my previous post about it here that contains a link to the report and discussion by Dr. Cordain.

 

The URL in the below article links to the special report and is worth taking the time to read - most of it is very understandable by the general public.

New York, 1 October, 2010 – A special article published today in the journal Nutrition sharply criticizes the recent Report of the 2010 Dietary Guidelines Advisory Committee (DGAC).  Authors Hite et al. argue the Report fails to conform to the standards of evidence-based medicine, despite its claimed reliance on a newly created USDA Nutrition Evidence Library. The authors call the DGAC to task for failing to consider recent scientific results while at the same time further confusing the American public.

The Dietary Guidelines are the basis for the USDA Food Pyramid, and serve as the foundation for nutritional information for Americans. The Guidelines also strongly influence nutrition education, research funding, governmental meal programs including school lunches, as well as providing direction for the food industry, regulatory agencies, consumer advocates, and the media.  They have been largely immune from criticism, perhaps a result of their wide application. 

The DGAC Report places the blame for many of America's chronic health problems on the inability of people to follow previous Dietary Guidelines, which have changed very little since the first recommendations were made in 1977.  Hite et al. explain that, in fact, nutrient consumption in the past thirty years has consistently moved in the direction of the Guidelines' recommendations for carbohydrate and fat, while calorie consumption has stayed within suggested ranges.  At the same time, the rates of obesity and Type 2 Diabetes have skyrocketed. 

In suggesting the need for an entirely new process, Richard David Feinman, Professor of Cell Biology at SUNY Downstate Medical Center said, "The previous Guidelines have not worked well.  It is simply unreasonable to ask the DGAC to audit its own work.  An external panel of scientists with no direct ties to nutritional policy would be able to do a more impartial evaluation of the data. This would be far better for everyone."

The article is titled "In The Face Of Contradictory Evidence: Report Of The Dietary Guidelines For Americans Committee" [pdf free download] by Adele H Hite, MAT; Richard D Feinman, PhD; Gabriel E Guzman, PhD; Morton Satin, MSc; Pamela Schoenfeld, RD; Richard J Wood, PhD. It appears in Nutrition, Volume 26, Issue 10 (October 2010) published by Elsevier. DOI: 10.1016/j.nut.2010.08.012.

# # #

The pdf file is a great read and discusses how biased and slanted the current guidelines are and how they don't represent the science correctly.